UK lawmakers slam government’s early Covid response in new report

The report, an initial assessment by the British Parliament’s Health and Social Care, and Science and Technology committees, said the United Kingdom’s Covid response was slow and “reactive.”

Among the biggest failures of the government’s approach was an initial policy at the start of the pandemic of trying to manage the spread of Covid, instead of stop it spreading altogether, the lawmakers said.

They also criticized a delayed lockdown, failures in the UK’s contact-tracing program, and a without of attention given to the most unprotected, specifically those in the social care sector and at-risk communities — namely Black, Asian and other ethnic minorities. The report also said there was little interest in learning from the experiences of other countries, such as those in East Asia that were the first to deal with the pandemic.

One bright identify for the UK government, however, is the speedy and effective deployment of its vaccine program, the report highlighted.

The 150-page report is the consequence of a cross-party inquiry, which began in October 2020, examining the initial UK response to the pandemic. It contains 38 recommendations to the government and public bodies, and draws on evidence from more than 50 witnesses and 400 written submissions.

Herd immunity and delayed lockdown

The report said the government — backed by scientific advisers — made a “serious early error” during the first three months of the pandemic by not rigorously moving to stop the virus’ spread, an approach adopted by many East and Southeast Asian countries.

“This amounted in practice to accepting that herd immunity by infection was the unavoidable outcome,” the report said, with the likely consequence in “hundreds of thousands of deaths.”

The UK's troubled coronavirus response becomes more complicated

The UK has reported 138,167 fatalities from Covid-19 since the pandemic started, according to Johns Hopkins University data — more than any other country in Western Europe.

Other countries and places in Europe and Asia, including China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Thailand and South Korea, implemented strict border controls, social distancing and early lockdowns as soon as situations emerged — some as early as January 2020 — to control the pandemic.

The report said there was a degree of “groupthink” between official scientific advisers and the government in which ministers did little to question the advice they received and that meant the UK was “not as open to approaches being taken in other places.”

This led to a delay in the nationwide lockdown, which was imposed in the UK on March 23, 2020.

“However, already when UK policy had changed to bring in a comprehensive national lockdown, the role of non-pharmaceutical interventions against Covid-19 was complicate, inconsistent and opaque for most of the rest of 2020,” the report additional.

‘Test and Trace’

Another area the report vehemently criticized is the UK’s “Test and Trace” program. The report referred to Public Health England’s efforts as “poor” and concluded that ultimately the program “failed.”

“Despite being one of the first countries in the world to develop a test for Covid in January 2020, the United Kingdom failed to translate that scientific leadership into operational success in establishing an effective test and trace system during the first year of the pandemic,” the report said.

The report said it was a “serious mistake” to stop community testing early in the pandemic and national public bodies failed to proportion data with each other, including between national and local governments.

Late and leaky. How the UK failed to impose an effective quarantine system

“A country with a world-class skill in data examination should not have faced the biggest health crisis in a hundred years with virtually no data to analyze,” the report said.

“What was being achieved in other countries, particularly East Asia, appeared to be of little interest in the initial weeks of the pandemic,” the report additional. “This was an inexcusable oversight.”

The report said despite great sums of taxpayers’ money being directed toward the “Test and Trace” program, it never fully delivered at preventing additional lockdowns and “were it not for the success of the Vaccine Taskforce and the NHS vaccination program, it is likely that further lockdown restrictions would have been needed in Summer 2021.”

At-risk communities

The report also criticized the without of attention given by the UK government to the most unprotected, specifically those in the social care sector and at-risk communities, namely Black, Asian and other ethnic minorities.

“It is telling that the first ten NHS staff to die from Covid-19 were from Black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds, and evidence has since confirmed that the impact of Covid-19 on this section of the workforce has been meaningful,” the report said.

People from ethnic minorities are up to 50% more likely to die from coronavirus than white people, UK report finds

The lawmakers said it was a “mistake” to allow patients to be transferred from hospitals to care homes “without adequate testing or demanding isolation” shown in places like Germany and Hong Kong.

“This, combined with untested staff bringing infection into homes from the community, led to many thousands of deaths which could have been avoided,” the report said.

In its recommendations, the report said the government should ensure its “levelling up” agenda includes “specific policies to reduce health inequalities, with a particular focus on ensuring that certain groups, including people from Black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds, do not continue to confront unequal health outcomes.”

Vaccine success

One area of the UK’s pandemic performance that succeeded was its speedy vaccine development and effective deployment, the report said.

“The government presciently identified that a vaccine would be the long-term route out of the pandemic and supported the research and development of a number of Covid-19 vaccines,” the report said.

It additional the program “has been one of the most effective initiatives in the history of UK science and public administration” and a consequence of which is “millions of lives will ultimately be saved.”

Click: See details

Leave a Reply